ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stigma and discrimination, particularly in access to healthcare, remains a major problem for people Infected with HIV in most parts of India. METHODS: We did a multicentre study (n = 10) with a cross-sectional survey design using a standardized, interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 2200 healthcare providers participated. The knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) related to HIV service delivery were very poor with a mean overall KAP score of only 49.7% (CI: 49.1-50.3). Only 5%, 5% and 1% of the participants scored more than 75% separately for the dimensions of knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively. Only 24.4% and 36.7% of responders knew that HIV screening was not recommended prior to surgery and pre-employment check-up. Many doctors (19.4%) had refused treatment to people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) at least some of the time and nearly half (47.2%) identified and labelled them; 23.9% isolated them in separate care areas and 13.3% postponed or changed treatment based on the patient's HIV status. Screening for HIV prior to elective surgery was done by 67% of providers. While 64.7% of responders were aware of the existence of national guidelines on and recommendations for HIV testing, only 38.4% had read the policy document. CONCLUSION: There is a growing need to provide care, support and treatment to a large number of PLHA. The capacity of healthcare providers must be urgently built up so as to improve their knowledge of and attitude to HIV to enable them to deliver evidence-based and compassionate care to PLHA in various healthcare settings.
Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Clinical Competence , Cluster Analysis , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Health Care Surveys , Health Policy , Hospitals/standards , Humans , India , Mass Screening/standards , Organizational Policy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prejudice , Primary Health Care/standards , Private Sector/standards , Public Sector/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Refusal to Treat , Stereotyping , Universal PrecautionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are offset by their gastrointestinal side effects. We evaluated whether oral ketotifen, which prevents experimental NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury, is superior to placebo in preventing NSAID-induced gastropathy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Rheumatology clinic in a tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A majority of the 53 subjects had rheumatoid arthritis (n = 36) or osteoarthritis (12). Those with comorbidity, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms or abnormal endoscopic findings at entry were excluded. Persons on steroids or NSAIDs in the previous month were also excluded. The subjects were started on indomethacin 25 mg thrice daily. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg ketotifen or placebo tablets. Compliance was measured by tablet count. OUTCOME MEASURE: At the end of every week a questionnaire was administered to elicit GI symptoms or adverse effects. Every patient underwent endoscopy after four weeks. RESULTS: Of 53 patients recruited (27 drug, 26 placebo), three (2 drug, 1 placebo) dropped out. The age, sex, NSAID use and clinical conditions were similar in the two groups. Eight in the drug group and 16 in the placebo group developed GI symptoms and/or endoscopic lesions (relative risk 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.95). The difference was significant on intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ketotifen significantly reduced the risk of GI side effects in patients on indomethacin.